3D Newspapers?

Yep. A Belgian paper has just issued its first 3D edition, according to AFP.

La Derniere Heure is a daily paper which issued a 3D edition on Tuesday, March 9.

The editor said: ”This is a trial, there’s no further (3D) plans for the time being.”

Is this simply a desperate attempt to re-kindle waning interest in newspapers?

Special glasses were provided for readers and the paper spent two months preparing this edition. The cost of producing this special edition must have far exceeded that of the regular run.

Slate Doesn’t Get EU

Yesterday, Slate published an article attempting to examine tensions between Germany and debt-ridden Greece, but which actually demonstrated gross simplification of the EU and a basic misunderstanding of what the EU is and how it operates.

German guilt over WWII was the driving force behind European unity? Eh? And apparently, according toSlate, the Germans are good-naturedly picking up bills right across the EU:

After all, the Germans have been paying for European unity—not just the currency but the farming subsidies, the assistance to poorer regions, the highways in Spain and Ireland—for decades without ever complaining much. In Warsaw, one sees children’s playgrounds proudly bearing signs declaring that they have been “built with European money,” most of which presumably comes from German taxpayers.

Yikes. Way to oversimplify the situation, guys.

Web Facilitates Accidental Plagiarism?

Gerald Posner of The Daily Beast has resigned following recent allegations of plagiarism.

Posner, who recently broke that texting story in the continuing saga of Elin and Tiger Woods, offered his resignation when Jack Shafer from Slate cited a number of examples of Posner’s alleged plagiarism.

Posner outlined his position on his blog, saying:

I realize how it is that I have inadvertently, but repeatedly, violated my own high standards. The core of my problem was in shifting from that of a book writer – with two years or more on a project – to what I describe as the “warp speed of the net.” For the Beast articles, I created master electronic files, which contained all the information I developed about a topic – that included interviews, scanned documents, published articles, and public information. I often had master files that were 15,000 words, that needed to be cut into a story of 1,000 to 1500 words.

In the compressed deadlines of the Beast, it now seems certain that those master file were a recipe for disaster for me. It allowed already published sources to get through to a number of my final and in the quick turnaround I then obviously lost sight of the fact that it belonged to a published source instead of being something I wrote.

Posner basically says that the speedy world of internet reporting meant his personal standards on original reporting were comprimised, and material he had gathered from other sources and writers which was intended for his own research, wound up in his finished articles.

We repeatedly hear that the 24/7 news cycle has increased pressure on reporters to be the first with the story. Information is so readily available online, it stands to reason that it will increasingly act as the first port of call for journalists researching a story. That said, ease of access to information combined with urgent publishing deadlines, shouldn’t result in accidental plagiarism.

Internet access should not affect the quality of journalism offered, other than to provide a more interactive platform for people to access their news or alternative viewpoints through blogs, extra links, videos, etc. Citing sources and referencing photos are par for the course for journalists, regardless of the medium they work in, so to take advantage of the web to, for example, nab photos from social networking sites without permission and citation, is lazy. So too is rewriting your source material without checking if you’re plagiarising or sending out wholely and genuinely original material.

And This Just In…

Tired of the same ol’ news format?

Charlie Brooker, Columnist with The Guardian, has put together a comprehensive guide to news reports called “How To Report The News”.

Priceless.

New Social Media Experiment Offers Little Insight

In an interesting but potentially pointless experiment, five French-speaking radio journalists are going to cut themselves off from their usual sources of info and instead rely solely on Facebook and Twitter.

The project aims to evaluate the value of information flowing through the social media sites.

Philippe Chaffanjon, director of the radio station France Info, said:

It is often being said that the traditional media are threatened by these alternative sources of information. But what view of the world do you get through Facebook and Twitter?

Ok, so let’s give this a go. According to my Facebook updates today, two friends have suffered weekend injuries, one has inadvertently locked their phone, and several have been tagged at their birthday parties. Oh, and apparently a campaign has been launched to get heavy metal recognised as a religion, while in Derbyshire, a bride has been explaining her decision to have 23 bridesmaids in tow.

I can’t say I feel terribly up to speed on today’s news. Am I doing this wrong?

But, as one person commented in the quotes following the original article, all they have to do when using Twitter is to sign up to news feeds from major networks and news sites and they’ll be kept nicely updated on all the main stories and headlines. The quality of your information, then, seems to largely depend on the quality of your contacts and feeds. It’s hard to see at this point what kind of quality insights the experiment can really offer.

NYTimes et al Return To Subscriptions Must Impact Aggregators

The New York Times has finally announced that it will be re-introducing subscription charges for its web content.

The full payment plan hasn’t been announced yet, but it will be a ‘metered’ system along the lines of those in place for The New Yorker and the Financial Times (providing free access to a limited number of articles before requiring payment for further access).

As newspaper revenues continue to fall, the NYT is just the latest to return to online subscriptions. Rupert Murdoch announced his intention to introduce charges for online content, and closer to home, the Irish Independent has been conducting surveys through its site which would seem to indicate interest in returning to charges for online readers.

It will be interesting to see the effect the re-introduction of subscriptions has on newspaper readership – it may well determine the sustainability of many publications. There will, of course, be a core dedicated readership who will subscribe to online editions, but for many people who simply want to read the news and are less particular about which masthead appears above it, news aggregators like Google News, The Huffington Post and Yahoo! News are going to continue picking up readers.

Arianna Huffington has spoken about how the debate of pay-for versus free content has degenerated into name calling, and writes that as far as she’s concerned:

Free content is not without problems. But it’s here to stay, and publishers need to come to terms with that and figure out how to make it work for them.

If subscriptions become the norm, however, surely the aggregators will have to develop a deal with news sites to access and re-publish content, or risk losing out on content they currently collate for free.

Most people don’t dispute that journalists should be paid for their work, so the crux of the conflict can be boiled down to this question: should readers pay for content, or should advertisers subsidise free content for readers?

The development of e-tablets (as discussed in an earlier blog) could have a huge impact on the direction of free content versus subscriptions if manufacturers do deals with publishers for exclusive or privileged access to news content.

Publishing World Awaits Apple Tab

Speculation surrounding Apple’s pending e-tablet continues to build. The release of competing products hasn’t distracted anyone from Apple’s launch later this month.

Media giant Hearst unveiled its super-bendy Skiff Reader at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in early Jan.

Microsoft and HP have already their slate PC, powered by the enormously popular Windows 7.

But the tech and publishing industries are holding their breath for the Apple version, which is being unveiled on Jan 27.

The main issue under speculation is whether Apple’s product will be tied with one publishing group, or if Apple have struck a deal with numerous groups to provide a broader cache of content, potentially lending a lifeline to struggling newspapers and magazines.

If Apple can include the strongest iPhone features and can overcome Kindle’s shortfalls, the iPad, iSlate, or whatever they’ll call it, stands in a good position to seriously change the future of publishing.

More debate, please!

TV3′s controversial coverage of the Lenihan story has brought some welcome debate on Irish media to our screens and papers.

Vincent Browne devoted a whole show to discussing Irish media, while the Irish Times and the Sunday Tribune featured articles considering the ethics and direction of Irish media.

Considering how little the Irish media comments on itself,  any level of discussion about media developments, coverage and interests in Ireland should be encouraged.

Here is the original TV3 piece:

Print Versus Online

Prefer your news online? In the current issue of The Atlantic, Michael Kinsley suggests that the strength of online news is its relative brevity in comparison with print editions.

Kinsley compares news coverage in The New York Times and The Washington Post, charting the word count used to introduce quotes or to explain different perspectives,  writing that increased verbosity has crept back into the craft:

Once upon a time, this unnecessary stuff was considered an advance over dry news reporting: don’t just tell the story; tell the reader what it means. But providing “context,” as it was known, has become an invitation to hype.

Brevity in online news is certainly a benefit of the medium, but the push for breaking news comes as a price as high-quality investigative journalism is on the wane and reactive coverage on the rise. Why newspapers can’t accommodate the two approaches is beyond me: laying out a story simply and clearly in the online edition of their paper (and hence exploiting breaking news), then relying on their quality commentators and writers for more in-depth analysis and investigation in the print editions.

Tomorrow’s newspapers are filled with today’s news and we’ve all heard the headlines by the time they go to print (TV and radio have been covering breaking news long before the internet), so why do papers still insist on playing catch-up on breaking news?

In their seminal style guide,  The Elements of Style, William Strunk Jr and E.B. White write:

Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subject only in outline, but that every word tell.

In The Atlantic, Kinsley questions the popularity of using lengthy anecdotes to introduce issues or stories, a technique I come across repeatedly in US news coverage in both print and broadcast.

I agree with Kinsley on this: it seems unnecessary and inefficient to rely on these lengthy anecdotes as a means of relating the human interest element of the story rather than delving right into the important issues or developments. The journalist should be able to make the impact of this bill/policy/story on the audience’s lives apparent without falling back on this tiresome story-telling technique.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.